Astrophytum caput-medusae (Velazco & Nevárez) D.R.Hunt
Cactaceae
Every figure on this page is derived from public data by a stated rule and says its source; nothing here is written by a person or a model, except the Wikipedia passage, which is quoted and marked as such. How it is made.
Summary
Astrophytum caput-medusae is a species of cactus native to Mexico.
Text from Wikipedia, “Astrophytum caput-medusae”, CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted as written. Kept separate from everything derived here.
About the genus · Astrophytum
Astrophytum is a genus of six species of cacti, native to North America.
Text from Wikipedia, “Astrophytum”, CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted as written.
Also known as Digitostigma caput-medusae Velazco & Nevárez.
Cultivation
Grouped as a cactus or succulent by the genus Astrophytum, which is reliably one kind of plant (archetype table). The table holds no figure for this group, which spans too much for one minimum, and no habitat climate is derived yet; no cold floor is given, and no prose comes from the table.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Papers naming this species
Works whose title or abstract names Astrophytum caput-medusae, most cited first, from OpenAlex (CC0). A mention, not a cultivation source: nothing on this page is drawn from them.
Related
Other Astrophytum 5 in the reference
Astrophytum asterias Seaurchin Starcactus
Astrophytum capricorne bishop's-cap
Astrophytum coahuilense Cactaceae
Astrophytum myriostigma bishop's-cap
Astrophytum ornatum monk's-hood History & registers
Where this page came from built 2026-09-20 · dossier v2 · node
gbif.species answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)gbif.synonyms answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)gbif.vernacular answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)wcvp.distribution answeredgbif.occurrences answeredGBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.3h4zamclimate nothing to reportwikidata answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)wikipedia answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20; this build: skippedinat.taxon not askedcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive)inat.photos.wild nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)inat.photos.cultivated nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)commons nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)gbif.media did not answerapi.gbif.org not asked: offline re-derivationopenalex answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20; this build: skippedEvery upstream is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, or refused. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 3 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.