Blechnum spinulosum Poir.
English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.
Photographs not checked
iNaturalist and GBIF media were skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not asked, or not answered, is not "none": nothing here claims there is none. Why the site says it this way.Summary
Doodia caudata is a species of dimorphic, evergreen fern in the family Blechnaceae, native to Australia and New Zealand. Upright clusters of fertile fronds reach 25 cm (10 in) in length. It has been introduced to the Azores, Madeira and Sri Lanka.
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Doodia caudata", CC BY-SA 4.0; its title is one of this species' older names (GBIF Backbone), which is the proof that the article is this species'.
Cultivation
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
This species has no GBIF key of its own. Its records are GBIF's under the key of the name Kew's World Checklist holds as this plant: 4078732 (Blechnum spinulosum Poir., 12 records). No name was matched to GBIF; the keys are read from Kew's synonymy. How.
How this section is made
Photographs
Related
Other Blechnum 52 in the reference
Blechnum appendiculatum Palm fern Photo: CC0, author not stated Blechnum attenuatum Aspleniaceae Blechnum auratum Aspleniaceae
Blechnum australe Southern Deer Fern Photo: CC BY, EliasNames & registers
Also known as Doodia aspera var. caudata; Blechnum rupestre; Doodia caudata var. dimorpha; Doodia caudata var. moorei; Doodia harryana and 10 more. (WCVP, RBG Kew)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Blechnum spinulosum Poir. (plant_name_id 3194677), read from Kew's names filegbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedwcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21this species has no GBIF key of its own; its records are read under GBIF's keys for the names Kew's file holds as this plant, never by a name matched; GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 12 records of GBIF's key 4078732, Blechnum spinulosum Poir. (Kew's file holds it as Blechnum spinulosum Poir. (accepted)): the GBIF downloadclimate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-2210 in-range records, none placed to within 10 kmwikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22found by Kew's IPNI identifier 17060400-1, POWO 17060400-1wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-22Wikipedia redirects Blechnum spinulosum to Doodia caudata, an older name of this species (Doodia caudata)inat.photos.wild not askedinat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedcommons nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 3 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.