Cattleya amethystoglossa Linden & Rchb.f. ex R.Warner
Summary
Cattleya amethystoglossa (the "amethyst-lipped Cattley flower") is a bifoliate species of orchid from the genus Cattleya.
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Cattleya amethystoglossa", CC BY-SA 4.0.
About the genus · Cattleya
Cattleya is a genus of orchids from Costa Rica south to Argentina. The genus is abbreviated C in trade journals.
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Cattleya", CC BY-SA 4.0.
Cultivation
Grouped as an orchid, listed under the genus Cattleya in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “pseudobulbous epiphyte”.
How this section is made
Each card states this species' habitat figures with their sources, and what two fixed rules read from them; nothing here says what the plant does, wants or tolerates. The rules · the terms.
Group. Listed under the genus Cattleya in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “pseudobulbous epiphyte”. A group is taken only where Kew's description of the species agrees with the table's listing. The table gives no figure and no prose; the cold floor is the habitat's alone.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
How this section is made
Photographs
Photographs: Franz Xaver, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Elena Gaillard from New York, USA, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Halleypo, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Orchi, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons (3).
Related
Other Cattleya 68 in the reference
Cattleya acuensis Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, André Ambrozio
Cattleya bradei Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Pedro Quinellato Dantas Cattleya briegeri Orchidaceae
Cattleya caulescens Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, agujaceratops
Cattleya cernua Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Pablo Cauã da Silva Toledo
Cattleya coccinea Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Alexandre MagnoNames & registers
Also known as Cattleya amethystoglossa f. alba; Cattleya amethystoglossa var. alba; Cattleya amethystoglossa var. keteleeri; Cattleya amethystoglossa var. rosea; Cattleya guttata var. keteleeri and 4 more. (GBIF Backbone)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-21
gbif.species answeredasked 2026-10-21gbif.synonyms answeredasked 2026-10-21gbif.vernacular answeredasked 2026-10-21names fetched 2026-10-21wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 1 record within 1 km of a botanic garden, herbarium or zoo left out (1 at a botanic garden or arboretum; Wikidata's list)climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-2116 in-range records, none placed to within 10 kmwikidata answeredasked 2026-10-21wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-21inat.photos.wild nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22from iNaturalist's open data of 2026-09-27: research-grade observations with an open-licence photograph, the 24 whose photographs iNaturalist received last (the open data holds no votes); filled 2026-10-22inat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media nothing to reportasked 2026-10-21commons answeredasked 2026-10-21openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 10 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.
