Chrysalidocarpus leptocheilos (Hodel) Eiserhardt & W.J.Baker
English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.
No habitat climate
Photographs not checked
iNaturalist and GBIF media were skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not asked, or not answered, is not "none": nothing here claims there is none. Why the site says it this way.Cultivation
Nothing derived: no habitat climate for this species.
Climate across the habitat
No habitat climate can be derived: 32 in-range records, none placed to within 10 km. 32 of the 32 in-range records are placed to worse than 10 km, or to no stated accuracy and fewer than three decimals or by something other than a person's observation, and cannot place a climate cell, though they count for the map and its marker.
Natural habitat
Native range as published by WCVP; the marker is where the records are densest and decides nothing.
Openly licensed records inside the range, framed on where they fall.
This species has no GBIF key of its own. Its records are GBIF's under the key of the name Kew's World Checklist holds as this plant: 2735895 (Dypsis leptocheilos (Hodel) Beentje & J.Dransf., 36 records). No name was matched to GBIF; the keys are read from Kew's synonymy. How.
NativeMadagascar · regions are the level-3 units of the World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions, as Kew's World Checklist records ranges, some under historical names such as Yugoslavia or Czechoslovakia (how).
Map marker-13.94, 48.213 · in the densest population, 20 records (63% of those in range)
Kew's description“tree” · “wet tropical” · quoted from WCVP, RBG Kew (CC BY 4.0); not derived here
Evidence usedThe map marker rests on all 32 georeferenced records inside the native range; the map shows only the 10 openly licensed ones, which alone would put the marker 16 km away. 3 records outside the WCVP native range not used. No climate across the range is derived for this species. 32 in-range records are placed to worse than 10 km, or with no stated accuracy (admitted only as a person's observation to three decimals), and stay on the map but off the climate.
Other GBIF keysRecords also from GBIF's key 2735895 (Dypsis leptocheilos (Hodel) Beentje & J.Dransf.): Kew's file holds it as Dypsis leptocheilos (Hodel) Beentje & J.Dransf. (synonym under Chrysalidocarpus leptocheilos (Hodel) Eiserhardt & W.J.Baker); 36 records, from GBIF's download.
How this section is made
The map marker: the openly licensed record nearest the middle of the densest 1° population of the 32 in-range records; it decides nothing. Records outside the native range, living specimens and records marked introduced are not used; which records count.
Photographs
Not checked. iNaturalist and GBIF media were skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not a statement that none exist.
Related
Other Chrysalidocarpus 10 in the reference
Chrysalidocarpus baronii Arecaceae Chrysalidocarpus cabadae Arecaceae Chrysalidocarpus carlsmithii Arecaceae Chrysalidocarpus decipiens Arecaceae Chrysalidocarpus lanceolatus Arecaceae Chrysalidocarpus lastellianus Arecaceae Chrysalidocarpus madagascariensis Arecaceae Chrysalidocarpus onilahensis Arecaceae 
Chrysalidocarpus pembanus Arecaceae Photo: CC BY, tanetahi Chrysalidocarpus robustus Arecaceae
Chrysalidocarpus pembanus Arecaceae Photo: CC BY, tanetahi Chrysalidocarpus robustus Arecaceae Names & registers
Also known as Neodypsis leptocheilos; Dypsis leptocheilos. (WCVP, RBG Kew)
The record
Family
Arecaceae
Described by
(Hodel) Eiserhardt & W.J.Baker
Native to
Madagascar
Wild records
32 in range · 10 open
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
Kew's names (WCVP)
kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Chrysalidocarpus leptocheilos (Hodel) Eiserhardt & W.J.Baker (plant_name_id 3303129), read from Kew's names fileGBIF species record
gbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedGBIF synonyms
gbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedGBIF common names
gbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedWCVP native range
wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04GBIF occurrence records
gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21this species has no GBIF key of its own; its records are read under GBIF's keys for the names Kew's file holds as this plant, never by a name matched; GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 36 records of GBIF's key 2735895, Dypsis leptocheilos (Hodel) Beentje & J.Dransf. (Kew's file holds it as Dypsis leptocheilos (Hodel) Beentje & J.Dransf. (synonym under Chrysalidocarpus leptocheilos (Hodel) Eiserhardt & W.J.Baker)): the GBIF download; 1 record within 1 km of a botanic garden, herbarium or zoo left out (1 at a botanic garden or arboretum; Wikidata's list)Habitat climate
climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-2232 in-range records, none placed to within 10 kmWikidata
wikidata nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22no item carries Kew's IPNI identifier 77314638-1, POWO 77314638-1Wikipedia
wikipedia nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22iNaturalist taxon
inat.taxon not askediNaturalist photographs, wild
inat.photos.wild not askediNaturalist photographs, cultivated
inat.photos.cultivated not askedGBIF media
gbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedWikimedia Commons
commons nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22OpenAlex papers
openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 3 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.