Condaliopsis divaricata (A.Nelson) G.L.Nesom
English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.
Photographs not checked
iNaturalist and GBIF media were skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not asked, or not answered, is not "none": nothing here claims there is none. Why the site says it this way.Cultivation
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
This species has no GBIF key of its own. Its records are GBIF's under the keys of the names Kew's World Checklist holds as this plant: 3876604 (Ziziphus divaricata (A.Nelson) Davidson & Moxley, 1 record), 5602924 (Condalia divaricata A.Nelson, 0 records). No name was matched to GBIF; the keys are read from Kew's synonymy. How.
Photographs
Related
Other Condaliopsis 1 in the reference
Names & registers
Also known as Ziziphus divaricata; Ziziphus obtusifolia var. canescens; Ziziphus lycioides var. canescens; Condaliopsis lycioides var. canescens; Condalia lycioides var. canescens and 2 more. (WCVP, RBG Kew)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Condaliopsis divaricata (A.Nelson) G.L.Nesom (plant_name_id 3303443), read from Kew's names filegbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedwcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredasked 2026-10-22this species has no GBIF key of its own; its records are read under GBIF's keys for the names Kew's file holds as this plant, never by a name matched; GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 1 record of GBIF's key 3876604, Ziziphus divaricata (A.Nelson) Davidson & Moxley (Kew's file holds it as Ziziphus divaricata (A.Nelson) Davidson & Moxley (synonym under Condaliopsis divaricata (A.Nelson) G.L.Nesom)): the GBIF download; 0 records of GBIF's key 5602924, Condalia divaricata A.Nelson (Kew's file holds it as Condalia divaricata A.Nelson (synonym under Condaliopsis divaricata (A.Nelson) G.L.Nesom)): GBIF occurrence search APIclimate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-221 in-range record, none placed to within 10 kmwikidata nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22no item carries Kew's IPNI identifier 77329994-1, POWO 77329994-1wikipedia nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22inat.taxon not askedinat.photos.wild not askedinat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedcommons nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 1 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.