
Summary
Dracula felix is a species of orchid.
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Dracula felix", CC BY-SA 4.0.
Cultivation
Grouped as an orchid, listed under the genus Dracula in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “epiphyte”.
How this section is made
Each card states this species' habitat figures with their sources, and what two fixed rules read from them; nothing here says what the plant does, wants or tolerates. The rules · the terms.
Group. Listed under the genus Dracula in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “epiphyte”. A group is taken only where Kew's description of the species agrees with the table's listing. The table gives no figure and no prose; the cold floor is the habitat's alone.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
How this section is made
Photographs
Photographs: (c) Frank Dietze, some rights reserved (CC BY); Orchi, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons (2); trixty, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons (3).
Related
Other Dracula 55 in the reference
Dracula amaliae Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Daniel Mesa
Dracula andreettae Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Nolan Exe Dracula anthracina Orchidaceae
Dracula astuta Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Andrey Loria
Dracula bella Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY-SA, Esteban Villa Restrepo
Dracula carlueri Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Jody Shugart
Dracula chimaera Chimera Dracula Photo: CC0, author not stated
Dracula chiroptera Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Frank Dietze all 56 ›Names & registers
Also known as Masdevallia felix. (GBIF Backbone)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
gbif.species answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.synonyms answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.vernacular answeredasked 2026-10-22names fetched 2026-10-22wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-2230 in-range records, none placed to within 10 kmwikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-22inat.photos.wild answeredasked 2026-10-22from iNaturalist's open data of 2026-09-27: research-grade observations with an open-licence photograph, the 24 whose photographs iNaturalist received last (the open data holds no votes); filled 2026-10-22inat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media answeredasked 2026-10-22none of the photographs on this page is credited to GBIF: those shown are other sources', and GBIF's were the same photographs or were set aside by the photograph rulescommons answeredasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 3 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.

