Example ⟳ +
An example collection, so you can see what this page does. Nothing added here is kept: leaving deletes it.

Echinopsis spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) A.E.Hoffm.

Cactaceae · Chile North · listed by its genus as a cactus or succulent

English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.

No habitat climate
Photographs not checked iNaturalist and GBIF media were skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not asked, or not answered, is not "none": nothing here claims there is none. Why the site says it this way.
Sow seed

Summary

Echinopsis spinibarbis, or quisco, is a species of cactus found in Chile.

Quoted from Wikipedia, "Echinopsis spinibarbis", CC BY-SA 4.0.

About the genus · Echinopsis

Echinopsis is a genus of cacti native to South America, sometimes known as hedgehog cactus, sea-urchin cactus or Easter lily cactus. As of November 2025, Plants of the World Online used a broad circumscription of the genus, resulting in about 80 accepted species, ranging from large and treelike types to small globose cacti. The name derives from echinos hedgehog or sea urchin, and opsis appearance, a reference to these plants' dense coverings of spines.

Quoted from Wikipedia, "Echinopsis", CC BY-SA 4.0.

Cultivation

Grouped as a cactus or succulent, listed under the genus Echinopsis in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “succulent subshrub or shrub”.

Nothing derived: no habitat climate for this species.
How this section is made

Each card states this species' habitat figures with their sources, and what two fixed rules read from them; nothing here says what the plant does, wants or tolerates. The rules · the terms.

Group. Listed under the genus Echinopsis in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “succulent subshrub or shrub”. A group is taken only where Kew's description of the species agrees with the table's listing. The table gives no figure and no prose; the cold floor is the habitat's alone.

Climate across the habitat

No habitat climate can be derived: No georeferenced record inside the range.

Natural habitat

Native range as published by WCVP.
No openly licensed record to show inside the range.

This species has no GBIF key of its own. Its records are GBIF's under the key of the name Kew's World Checklist holds as this plant: 3951615 (Trichocereus spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) F.Ritter, 0 records). No name was matched to GBIF; the keys are read from Kew's synonymy. How.

NativeChile North · regions are the level-3 units of the World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions, as Kew's World Checklist records ranges, some under historical names such as Yugoslavia or Czechoslovakia (how).
Kew's description“succulent subshrub or shrub” · “desert or dry shrubland” · quoted from WCVP, RBG Kew (CC BY 4.0); not derived here
Evidence usedNo georeferenced records inside the stated native range.
Other GBIF keysRecords also from GBIF's key 3951615 (Trichocereus spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) F.Ritter): Kew's file holds it as Trichocereus spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) F.Ritter (synonym under Echinopsis spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) A.E.Hoffm.); 0 records, from GBIF's search API on the day of the build.

Photographs

Not checked. iNaturalist and GBIF media were skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not a statement that none exist.

Other Echinopsis 48 in the reference

Names & registers

Also known as Cereus spinibarbis; Eulychnia spinibarbis; Echinocereus spinibarbis; Trichocereus spinibarbis. (WCVP, RBG Kew)

The record

Family
Cactaceae
Described by
(Otto ex Pfeiff.) A.E.Hoffm.
Native to
Chile North
Wild records
none in range

Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →

Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
Kew's names (WCVP) kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Echinopsis spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) A.E.Hoffm. (plant_name_id 2783653), read from Kew's names file
GBIF species record gbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
GBIF synonyms gbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
GBIF common names gbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
WCVP native range wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04
GBIF occurrence records gbif.occurrences nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22this species has no GBIF key of its own; its records are read under GBIF's keys for the names Kew's file holds as this plant, never by a name matched; 0 records of GBIF's key 3951615, Trichocereus spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) F.Ritter (Kew's file holds it as Trichocereus spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) F.Ritter (synonym under Echinopsis spinibarbis (Otto ex Pfeiff.) A.E.Hoffm.)): GBIF occurrence search API
Habitat climate climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22no georeferenced record inside the range
Wikidata wikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22found by Kew's IPNI identifier 947197-1, POWO 947197-1
Wikipedia wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-22
iNaturalist taxon inat.taxon not asked
iNaturalist photographs, wild inat.photos.wild not asked
iNaturalist photographs, cultivated inat.photos.cultivated not asked
GBIF media gbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
Wikimedia Commons commons nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22
OpenAlex papers openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshot

Every source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence.

Cultifolio

Opening your plants…