Summary
Encyclia advena is a species of epiphytic orchid, native to Atlantic forests in Brazil.
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Encyclia advena", CC BY-SA 4.0.
Cultivation
Grouped as an orchid, listed under the genus Encyclia in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “pseudobulbous epiphyte”.
How this section is made
Each card states this species' habitat figures with their sources, and what two fixed rules read from them; nothing here says what the plant does, wants or tolerates. The rules · the terms.
Group. Listed under the genus Encyclia in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “pseudobulbous epiphyte”. A group is taken only where Kew's description of the species agrees with the table's listing. The table gives no figure and no prose; the cold floor is the habitat's alone.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
How this section is made
Photographs
Photographs: NasserHalaweh, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons (2).
Related
Other Encyclia 41 in the reference
Encyclia adenocarpos Orchidaceae Photo: CC0, Sinaloa Silvestre
Encyclia adenocaula Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY-SA, Aarón Sandoval Encyclia aenicta Orchidaceae
Encyclia alata Winged Encyclia Photo: CC BY-SA, Jalil R. Encyclia ambigua Orchidaceae
Encyclia argentinensis Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Tomás Carranza Perales
Encyclia aspera Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Raúl A. Ruiz M.
Encyclia belizensis Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Trevor Harding
Encyclia bractescens María's Encyclia Photo: CC BY, Miguel Sho
Encyclia candollei Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Claudio Cantú Muñiz
Encyclia ceratistes Orchidaceae Photo: CC BY, Lauren L. all 42 ›Names & registers
Also known as Encyclia capartiana; Encyclia hollandae; Encyclia hollandiae; Encyclia megalantha; Epidendrum advenum and 3 more. (GBIF Backbone)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
gbif.species answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.synonyms answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.vernacular answeredasked 2026-10-22names fetched 2026-10-22wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 1 record within 1 km of a botanic garden, herbarium or zoo left out (1 at a botanic garden or arboretum; Wikidata's list)climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-2223 in-range records, none placed to within 10 kmwikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-22inat.photos.wild nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22from iNaturalist's open data of 2026-09-27: research-grade observations with an open-licence photograph, the 24 whose photographs iNaturalist received last (the open data holds no votes); filled 2026-10-22inat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22commons answeredasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 11 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.
