Iris × fulvala Dykes
Iris
A hybrid: I. brevicaulis × I. fulva, the parents Kew's World Checklist states for it (WCVP, RBG Kew).
Photographs not checked
iNaturalist was skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not asked, or not answered, is not "none": nothing here claims there is none. Why the site says it this way.Summary
Iris × fulvala is a hybrid species between Iris brevicaulis and Iris fulva (American copper iris).
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Iris × fulvala", CC BY-SA 4.0.
Cultivation
Grouped as a bulb, tuber or caudex, listed under the genus Iris in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “rhizomatous geophyte”.
How this section is made
Each card states this species' habitat figures with their sources, and what two fixed rules read from them; nothing here says what the plant does, wants or tolerates. The rules · the terms.
Group. Listed under the genus Iris in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “rhizomatous geophyte”. A group is taken only where Kew's description of the species agrees with the table's listing. The table gives no figure and no prose; the cold floor is the habitat's alone.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Photographs
Related
Other Iris 182 in the reference
Iris acutiloba Iridaceae Photo: CC0, author not stated Iris aitchisonii Iridaceae 
Iris alberti Iridaceae Photo: CC BY, Islam Galymzhanov Iris albomarginata Iridaceae 
Iris alexeenkoi Iridaceae Photo: CC BY, info.botdb.ru
Iris aphylla Stool iris Photo: CC BY, Мирослав Соболев
Iris arenaria Iridaceae Photo: CC BY, Oleksii Vasyliuk
Iris atropurpurea Coastal Iris Photo: CC BY, Nachman bones
Iris aucheri Aucher-Eloy Iris Photo: CC BY-SA, Anas A. Emad Iris baldshuanica Iridaceae 
Iris barbatula Iridaceae Photo: CC BY, Morten Ross
Iris barnumiae Iridaceae Photo: CC BY-SA, Mehrad Rousta all 183 ›Names & registers
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
gbif.species answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.synonyms answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.vernacular answeredasked 2026-10-22names fetched 2026-10-22wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22no georeferenced record inside the rangewikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-22inat.photos.wild nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22from iNaturalist's open data of 2026-09-27: research-grade observations with an open-licence photograph, the 24 whose photographs iNaturalist received last (the open data holds no votes); filled 2026-10-22inat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22commons nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence.