Example ⟳ +
An example collection, so you can see what this page does. Nothing added here is kept: leaving deletes it.

Lophophora alberto-vojtechii Bohata, Myšák & Šnicer

Cactaceae · Mexico Northeast · listed by its genus as a cactus or succulent

English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.

Sow seed

GBIF's records not checked. GBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked. So this page has no points on its map, no map marker, no habitat climate, no cultivation sheet and no species of nearest climate; the range is Kew's. Not a statement that none exist. How.

Lophophora alberto-vojtechii, photograph P Gonzalez Zamora, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia CommonsLophophora alberto-vojtechii, photograph Oscar Israel Rodríguez Ortiz, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia CommonsLophophora alberto-vojtechii, photograph Oscar Israel Rodríguez Ortiz, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia CommonsLophophora alberto-vojtechii, photograph Pedro Nájera Quezada, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia CommonsLophophora alberto-vojtechii, photograph Pedro Nájera Quezada, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia CommonsLophophora alberto-vojtechii, photograph Pedro Nájera Quezada, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons 9 photographs ›

Summary

Lophophora alberto-vojtechii is a species of Lophophora found in Mexico. It is a miniature species of Lophophora. The alkaloid content of Lophophora alberto-vojtechii has yet to be established, but probably contains much less mescaline than Lophophora williamsii (peyote) similarly to other Lophophora species such as Lophophora diffusa (false peyote). Lophophora alberto-vojtechii was first discovered in 2007 and was first described in the scientific literature in 2008 or 2009.

Quoted from Wikipedia, "Lophophora alberto-vojtechii", CC BY-SA 4.0.

About the genus · Lophophora

Lophophora is a genus of spineless, button-like cacti. Its native range covers Texas through Mexico to southwestern Mexico. The species are extremely slow growing, taking around ten years to reach maturity from seed in the wild. More on Wikipedia ›

Quoted from Wikipedia, "Lophophora", CC BY-SA 4.0.

Cultivation

Grouped as a cactus or succulent, listed under the genus Lophophora in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “succulent subshrub”.

Not checked: GBIF's records were not asked (why, under the name), and the habitat climate is read only from them, so no sheet is derived.
How this section is made

Each card states this species' habitat figures with their sources, and what two fixed rules read from them; nothing here says what the plant does, wants or tolerates. The rules · the terms.

Group. Listed under the genus Lophophora in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “succulent subshrub”. A group is taken only where Kew's description of the species agrees with the table's listing. The table gives no figure and no prose; the cold floor is the habitat's alone.

Climate across the habitat

Not checked. GBIF's records were not asked (why, under the name), and the habitat climate is read only from them, so none is derived here. This is not a statement that no climate exists.

Natural habitat

Native range as published by WCVP.
Records not checked: GBIF's records were not asked, as said under the name.
NativeMexico Northeast · regions are the level-3 units of the World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions, as Kew's World Checklist records ranges, some under historical names such as Yugoslavia or Czechoslovakia (how).
Kew's description“succulent subshrub” · “desert or dry shrubland” · quoted from WCVP, RBG Kew (CC BY 4.0); not derived here
Evidence usedGBIF's records not checked, as said under the name: so there are no points on the map, no map marker and no climate across the range; the range is Kew's. Not a statement that no record exists.

Photographs

Photographs: P Gonzalez Zamora, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Oscar Israel Rodríguez Ortiz, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons (2); Pedro Nájera Quezada, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons (3).

Similar habitat climate Not checked: GBIF's records were not asked (why, under the name), and the nearest habitat climates are read from the climate they give.

Other Lophophora 3 in the reference

Names & registers

The record

Family
Cactaceae
Described by
Bohata, Myšák & Šnicer
Native to
Mexico Northeast
Records
not checked · GBIF's records were not asked: the page has no GBIF key

Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →

Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
Kew's names (WCVP) kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Lophophora alberto-vojtechii Bohata, Myšák & Šnicer (plant_name_id 2607767), read from Kew's names file
GBIF species record gbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
GBIF synonyms gbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
GBIF common names gbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
GBIF occurrence records gbif.occurrences not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
WCVP native range wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04
Habitat climate climate not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked, and the habitat climate is read only from them
Wikidata wikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22found by Kew's IPNI identifier 77091505-1, POWO 77091505-1
Wikipedia wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-22
iNaturalist photographs, wild inat.photos.wild not asked
iNaturalist photographs, cultivated inat.photos.cultivated not asked
GBIF media gbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked
Wikimedia Commons commons answeredasked 2026-10-22
OpenAlex papers openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshot

Every source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence.

Cultifolio

Opening your plants…