Meconopsis betonicifolia Franch.
English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.
Summary
Meconopsis betonicifolia (syn. Meconopsis baileyi), the Himalayan blue poppy, is a species of flowering plant in the family Papaveraceae. It was first formally named for western science in 1912 by the British officer Lt. Col. Frederick Marshman Bailey.
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Meconopsis betonicifolia", CC BY-SA 4.0.
Cultivation
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
This species has no GBIF key of its own. Its records are GBIF's under the key of the name Kew's World Checklist holds as this plant: 3603883 (Cathcartia betonicifolia (Franch.) Prain, 112 records). No name was matched to GBIF; the keys are read from Kew's synonymy. How.
How this section is made
Photographs
Photographs: Meneerke bloem, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Hedwig Storch, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; ghislain118 http://www.fleurs-des-montagnes.net, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; d’Apreval, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons; Llorenzi, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Krzysztof Golik, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Related
Other Meconopsis 31 in the reference
Meconopsis aculeata Thorny satin poppy Photo: CC0, author not stated
Meconopsis baileyi Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY, 王天明 Meconopsis × cookei Papaveraceae Meconopsis delavayi Papaveraceae Meconopsis dhwojii Papaveraceae Meconopsis discigera Papaveraceae
Meconopsis gakyidiana Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY, Morten Ross
Meconopsis grandis Blue Poppy Photo: CC BY, Jiao Sun (孙娇)
Meconopsis henrici Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY, Wang.QG
Meconopsis horridula Prickly blue-poppy Photo: CC0, author not stated Meconopsis impedita Papaveraceae
Meconopsis integrifolia Farrer's lampshade-poppy Photo: CC BY, Morten Ross all 32 ›Names & registers
Also known as Papaver betonicifolium; Cathcartia betonicifolia; Meconopsis betonicifolia f. franchetii. (WCVP, RBG Kew)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Meconopsis betonicifolia Franch. (plant_name_id 2502572), read from Kew's names filegbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedwcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21this species has no GBIF key of its own; its records are read under GBIF's keys for the names Kew's file holds as this plant, never by a name matched; GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 112 records of GBIF's key 3603883, Cathcartia betonicifolia (Franch.) Prain (Kew's file holds it as Cathcartia betonicifolia (Franch.) Prain (synonym under Meconopsis betonicifolia Franch.)): the GBIF download; 5 records within 1 km of a botanic garden, herbarium or zoo left out (4 at a botanic garden or arboretum, 1 at a herbarium; Wikidata's list)climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22only 2 distinct land cells of the climate grid hold an in-range record placed to within 10 km; three are needed for an envelopewikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22found by Kew's IPNI identifier 673278-1, POWO 673278-1wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-22inat.photos.wild not askedinat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedcommons answeredasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 17 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.
