Pelecyphora laredoi (Glass & R.A.Foster) D.Aquino & Dan.Sanchez
Cactaceae
Every figure on this page is derived from public data by a stated rule and says its source; nothing here is written by a person or a model, except the Wikipedia passage, which is quoted and marked as such. How it is made.
Summary
Pelecyphora laredoi is a species of flowering plant in the family Cactaceae, native to Mexico.
Text from Wikipedia, “Pelecyphora laredoi”, CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted as written. Kept separate from everything derived here.
About the genus · Pelecyphora
Pelecyphora, pincushion cactus or foxtail cactus is a genus of cacti, comprising 20 species. They originate from Mexico and the United States.
Text from Wikipedia, “Pelecyphora”, CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted as written.
Also known as Coryphantha laredoi Glass & R.A.Foster; Escobaria laredoi (Glass & R.A.Foster) N.P.Taylor.
Cultivation
Grouped as a cactus or succulent by the genus Pelecyphora, which is reliably one kind of plant (archetype table). The table holds no figure for this group, which spans too much for one minimum, and no habitat climate is derived yet; no cold floor is given, and no prose comes from the table.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Papers naming this species
Works whose title or abstract names Pelecyphora laredoi, most cited first, from OpenAlex (CC0). A mention, not a cultivation source: nothing on this page is drawn from them.
Related
Other Pelecyphora 19 in the reference
Pelecyphora alversonii Cactaceae
Pelecyphora aselliformis hatchet cactus
Pelecyphora chihuahuensis Cactaceae Pelecyphora cubensis Cactaceae
Pelecyphora dasyacantha Cactaceae
Pelecyphora duncanii Cactaceae
Pelecyphora emskoetteriana Cactaceae
Pelecyphora hesteri Cactaceae
Pelecyphora lloydii Cactaceae
Pelecyphora macromeris nipple beehive cactus
Pelecyphora minima Cactaceae all 20 ›History & registers
Where this page came from built 2026-09-20 · dossier v2 · node
gbif.species answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)gbif.synonyms answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)gbif.vernacular answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)wcvp.distribution answeredgbif.occurrences answeredGBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.3h4zamclimate nothing to reportwikidata answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)wikipedia answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19; this build: skippedinat.taxon not askedinat.photos.wild nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)inat.photos.cultivated nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)commons nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)gbif.media did not answerapi.gbif.org not asked: offline re-derivationopenalex answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19; this build: skippedEvery upstream is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, or refused. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 3 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.