Rosa × hollandica Pers. ex Steud.
A hybrid: R. cinnamomea × R. rugosa, the parents Kew's World Checklist states for it (WCVP, RBG Kew).
Photographs not checked
iNaturalist was skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not asked, or not answered, is not "none": nothing here claims there is none. Why the site says it this way.Cultivation
Grouped as a temperate garden plant, listed under the genus Rosa in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “shrub”, “temperate”.
How this section is made
Each card states this species' habitat figures with their sources, and what two fixed rules read from them; nothing here says what the plant does, wants or tolerates. The rules · the terms.
Group. Listed under the genus Rosa in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “shrub”, “temperate”. A group is taken only where Kew's description of the species agrees with the table's listing. The table gives no figure and no prose; the cold floor is the habitat's alone.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Photographs
Related
Other Rosa 126 in the reference
Rosa abyssinica Abyssinian rose Photo: CC BY, Jacky Judas
Rosa acicularis Prickly rose Photo: CC BY, Syd Cannings
Rosa agrestis Small-leaved Sweet-briar Photo: CC BY, Bobo-X
Rosa × alba White rose of York Photo: CC BY, jamie-aa
Rosa alberti Rosaceae Photo: CC BY, Alexander Dubynin
Rosa arkansana Prairie rose Photo: CC0, author not stated
Rosa arvensis Field rose Photo: CC BY, David Sandler
Rosa banksiae Banksian rose Photo: CC BY, Janetmhm all 127 ›Names & registers
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
gbif.species answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.synonyms answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.vernacular answeredasked 2026-10-22names fetched 2026-10-22wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04the range is Kew's entry Rosa × hollandica (Pers.) Gand.; the name is cited Pers. ex Steud.; Kew's entry lists no native region, only 7 where it is introducedgbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22native range not verified: no WCVP distribution with native status for this name, so records cannot be told from cultivation and no habitat climate is derivedwikidata nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22wikipedia nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22inat.taxon not askedinat.photos.wild not askedinat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22commons nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 2 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.