Actaea cordifolia DC.
English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.
GBIF's records not checked. GBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked. So this page has no points on its map, no map marker, no habitat climate, no cultivation sheet and no species of nearest climate; the range is Kew's. Not a statement that none exist. How.
Cultivation
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Photographs
Photographs: Salicyna, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons (6).
Related
Similar habitat climate Not checked: GBIF's records were not asked (why, under the name), and the nearest habitat climates are read from the climate they give.
Other Actaea 17 in the reference
Actaea asiatica Asian baneberry Photo: CC BY, Jane Charlen
Actaea cimicifuga Chinese cimicifuga Photo: CC BY, Oleg Kosterin
Actaea dahurica Dahurian bugbane Photo: CC BY, Tatyana Petrenko
Actaea elata Tall bugbane Photo: CC BY, Cody Hinchliff
Actaea erythrocarpa Red baneberry Photo: CC BY, Sergey Basalaev
Actaea europaea Ranunculaceae Photo: CC BY, Bobo-X
Actaea pachypoda White baneberry Photo: CC0, author not stated
Actaea podocarpa American bugbane Photo: CC BY, Alaina Krakowiak
Actaea racemosa Black snakeroot Photo: CC0, author not stated all 18 ›Names & registers
Also known as Cimicifuga rubifolia; Cimicifuga racemosa var. cordifolia; Thalictrodes cordifolia; Cimicifuga cordifolia; Actaea rubifolia. (WCVP, RBG Kew)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Actaea cordifolia DC. (plant_name_id 2620528), read from Kew's names filegbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.occurrences not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedwcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04climate not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not asked, and the habitat climate is read only from themwikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22found by Kew's IPNI identifier 316212-2, POWO 316212-2wikipedia nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22inat.photos.wild not askedinat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedcommons answeredasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence.