Encephalartos ituriensis Bamps & Lisowski
Ituri Forest Cycad
2 photographs › Summary
Encephalartos ituriensis (common name Ituri Forest cycad) is a palm-like cycad of the family Zamiaceae. It is native to the grassland on two large granite monadnocks of the Ituri forest area in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Its IUCN conservation status is "Near Threatened."
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Encephalartos ituriensis", CC BY-SA 4.0.
About the genus · Encephalartos
Encephalartos is a genus of cycad native to Africa. Several species of Encephalartos are commonly referred to as bread trees, or bread palms since a bread-like starchy food can be prepared from the centre of the stem. The genus name is derived from Ancient Greek ἐγκέφαλος, meaning "head", and ἄρτος, meaning "bread", referring to the use of the pith to make food. More on Wikipedia ›
Quoted from Wikipedia, "Encephalartos", CC BY-SA 4.0.
Cultivation
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Photographs
Photographs: andy_king50, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Related
Other Encephalartos 48 in the reference
Encephalartos aemulans Ngotshe Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, andy_king50 Encephalartos afer Zamiaceae 
Encephalartos altensteinii Eastern Cape Cycad Photo: CC BY, Henry de Lange
Encephalartos aplanatus Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, andy_king50
Encephalartos arenarius Alexandria Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, J Brew
Encephalartos barteri Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, C T Johansson
Encephalartos bubalinus Lake Natron Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, Dryas
Encephalartos cerinus Waxen Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, andy_king50
Encephalartos chimanimaniensis Chimanimani Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, andy_king50
Encephalartos concinnus Runde Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, J Brew
Encephalartos cupidus Blyde River Cycad Photo: CC BY-SA, User:BotBln Encephalartos dyerianus Lowveld Cycad all 49 ›Names & registers
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
gbif.species answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.synonyms answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.vernacular answeredasked 2026-10-22names fetched 2026-10-22wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 3 records within 1 km of a botanic garden, herbarium or zoo left out (1 at a botanic garden or arboretum, 2 at a zoo; Wikidata's list)climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-221 in-range record, none placed to within 10 kmwikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22wikipedia answeredasked 2026-10-22inat.photos.wild nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22from iNaturalist's open data of 2026-09-27: research-grade observations with an open-licence photograph, the 24 whose photographs iNaturalist received last (the open data holds no votes); filled 2026-10-22inat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22commons answeredasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 2 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.