Narcissus × tenuior Curtis
A hybrid: N. jonquilla × N. poeticus, the parents Kew's World Checklist states for it (WCVP, RBG Kew).
Photographs not checked
iNaturalist was skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not asked, or not answered, is not "none": nothing here claims there is none. Why the site says it this way.Cultivation
Grouped as a bulb, tuber or caudex, listed under the genus Narcissus in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “bulbous geophyte”.
How this section is made
Each card states this species' habitat figures with their sources, and what two fixed rules read from them; nothing here says what the plant does, wants or tolerates. The rules · the terms.
Group. Listed under the genus Narcissus in the archetype table, and Kew describes it as “bulbous geophyte”. A group is taken only where Kew's description of the species agrees with the table's listing. The table gives no figure and no prose; the cold floor is the habitat's alone.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Photographs
Related
Other Narcissus 49 in the reference
Narcissus albicans Amaryllidaceae Photo: CC BY, sunoochi from Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Narcissus assoanus Rush-leaf jonquil Photo: CC BY, Oriol Sastre Narcissus atlanticus Amaryllidaceae 
Narcissus bicolor Two-coloured Daffodil Photo: CC BY-SA, Luis Fuentes
Narcissus broussonetii Amaryllidaceae Photo: CC BY, Apofisis Narcissus bujei Amaryllidaceae 
Narcissus bulbocodium Hoop-petticoat daffodil Photo: CC BY, David Pereira
Narcissus calcicola Amaryllidaceae Photo: CC BY, zebedeugalinha
Narcissus cantabricus White hoop petticoat daffodil Photo: CC BY, Borja Fierro
Narcissus cavanillesii Amaryllidaceae Photo: CC0, author not stated
Narcissus confusus Amaryllidaceae Photo: CC BY, frangp Narcissus cordubensis Amaryllidaceae all 50 ›Names & registers
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
gbif.species answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.synonyms answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.vernacular answeredasked 2026-10-22names fetched 2026-10-22wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22no georeferenced record inside the rangewikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22wikipedia nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22inat.taxon not askedinat.photos.wild not askedinat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22commons nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 1 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.