Oreomecon amurensis (N.Busch) Galasso, Banfi & Bartolucci
English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.
Cultivation
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
This species has no GBIF key of its own. Its records are GBIF's under the keys of the names Kew's World Checklist holds as this plant: 3603152 (Papaver amurense (N.Busch) Karrer, 14 records), 3603616 (Papaver nudicaule f. amurense (N.Busch) H.Chuang, 4 records), 7635717 (Papaver nudicaule subsp. amurense N.Busch, 24 records), 8385484 (Papaver amurense (N.Busch) N.Busch ex Tolm., 88 records), 8631861 (Papaver amurense (N.Busch) N.Busch, 0 records). No name was matched to GBIF; the keys are read from Kew's synonymy. How.
How this section is made
Photographs
Photographs: C T Johansson, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons (4); Oleg Kosterin, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Related
Other Oreomecon 11 in the reference
Names & registers
Also known as Papaver amurense; Papaver nudicaule f. seticarpum; Papaver nudicaule var. glabricarpum; Papaver nudicaule var. seticarpum; Papaver nudicaule f. amurense and 3 more. (WCVP, RBG Kew)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Oreomecon amurensis (N.Busch) Galasso, Banfi & Bartolucci (plant_name_id 3307136), read from Kew's names filegbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedwcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredasked 2026-10-22this species has no GBIF key of its own; its records are read under GBIF's keys for the names Kew's file holds as this plant, never by a name matched; GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 14 records of GBIF's key 3603152, Papaver amurense (N.Busch) Karrer (Kew's file holds it as Papaver amurense (N.Busch) Karrer (synonym under Oreomecon amurensis (N.Busch) Galasso, Banfi & Bartolucci)): the GBIF download; 4 records of GBIF's key 3603616, Papaver nudicaule f. amurense (N.Busch) H.Chuang (Kew's file holds it as Papaver nudicaule f. amurense (N.Busch) H.Chuang (synonym under Oreomecon amurensis (N.Busch) Galasso, Banfi & Bartolucci)): the GBIF download; 24 records of GBIF's key 7635717, Papaver nudicaule subsp. amurense N.Busch (Kew's file holds it as Papaver nudicaule subsp. amurense N.Busch (synonym under Oreomecon amurensis (N.Busch) Galasso, Banfi & Bartolucci)): the GBIF download; 88 records of GBIF's key 8385484, Papaver amurense (N.Busch) N.Busch ex Tolm. (Kew's file holds it as Papaver amurense (N.Busch) Karrer (synonym under Oreomecon amurensis (N.Busch) Galasso, Banfi & Bartolucci)): the GBIF download; 0 records of GBIF's key 8631861, Papaver amurense (N.Busch) N.Busch (Kew's file holds it as Papaver amurense (N.Busch) Karrer (synonym under Oreomecon amurensis (N.Busch) Galasso, Banfi & Bartolucci)): GBIF occurrence search APIclimate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22only 2 distinct land cells of the climate grid hold an in-range record placed to within 10 km; three are needed for an envelopewikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22found by Kew's IPNI identifier 77332859-1, POWO 77332859-1wikipedia nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22inat.photos.wild not askedinat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedcommons answeredasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 7 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.
