Oreomecon lisae (N.Busch) Grey-Wilson
English names not checked: Wikidata's common names were not read for this page.
Cultivation
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
This species has no GBIF key of its own. Its records are GBIF's under the key of the name Kew's World Checklist holds as this plant: 3600901 (Papaver lisae N.Busch, 2 records). No name was matched to GBIF; the keys are read from Kew's synonymy. How.
Related
Other Oreomecon 11 in the reference
Oreomecon alpina Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY, Benjamin Zwittnig
Oreomecon amurensis Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY, C T Johansson Oreomecon canescens Papaveraceae Oreomecon chakassica Papaveraceae Oreomecon crocea Papaveraceae 
Oreomecon fauriei Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY, sunoochi
Oreomecon lapponica Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY, Takeo Goto Oreomecon miyabeana Papaveraceae 
Oreomecon popovii Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY-SA, Krzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz
Oreomecon radicata Papaveraceae Photo: CC BY-SA, Ansgar Walk Names & registers
Also known as Papaver lisae; Papaver oreophilum f. obtusifolium; Papaver monanthum var. obtusifolium. (WCVP, RBG Kew)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
kew.names answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry Oreomecon lisae (N.Busch) Grey-Wilson (plant_name_id 3307127), read from Kew's names filegbif.species not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.synonyms not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedgbif.vernacular not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedwcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04gbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21this species has no GBIF key of its own; its records are read under GBIF's keys for the names Kew's file holds as this plant, never by a name matched; GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 2 records of GBIF's key 3600901, Papaver lisae N.Busch (Kew's file holds it as Papaver lisae N.Busch (synonym under Oreomecon lisae (N.Busch) Grey-Wilson)): the GBIF downloadclimate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22only 2 distinct land cells of the climate grid hold an in-range record placed to within 10 km; three are needed for an envelopewikidata nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22no item carries Kew's IPNI identifier 77332853-1, POWO 77332853-1wikipedia nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22inat.taxon not askedinat.photos.wild not askedinat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media not askedGBIF's backbone holds no one accepted species of this name, and a name it holds only as another species' synonym is not taken for this one, so GBIF's records were not askedcommons answeredasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 2 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.