Salix × speciosa Host
A hybrid: S. euxina × S. triandra, the parents Kew's World Checklist states for it (WCVP, RBG Kew).
Photographs not checked
iNaturalist was skipped (not asked) when this page was built. Not asked, or not answered, is not "none": nothing here claims there is none. Why the site says it this way.Cultivation
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Photographs
Related
Other Salix 159 in the reference
Salix acmophylla Common Middle East willow Photo: CC BY, Nachman bones
Salix acutifolia Siberian violet-willow Photo: CC0, author not stated
Salix alaxensis Felt-leaf willow Photo: CC BY, Ingvild Riska
Salix alba White willow Photo: CC BY, Codrin Bucur
Salix alpina Salicaceae Photo: CC0, author not stated
Salix amygdaloides Peach-leaf willow Photo: CC0, author not stated
Salix apennina Large-leaved willow Photo: CC BY, Milan Chytrý
Salix apoda Salicaceae Photo: CC BY, Dmitriy Bochkov
Salix appendiculata Salicaceae Photo: CC BY, Tom and T Herman all 160 ›Names & registers
Also known as Salix alopecuroides; Salix amygdalina var. subtriandra; Salix limosa; Salix triandra var. villosa; Salix xalopecuroides. (GBIF Backbone)
Under another author Salix euxina x triandra and Salix euxina × triandra is an older name of this species, not Salix euxina, a species of the reference; Salix fragilis × triandra is an older name of this species, not Salix fragilis, a species of the reference; Salix lapponum Turcz. is an older name of this species, not Salix lapponum, a species of the reference. (GBIF Backbone)
The record
Every figure here is derived from public data by a stated rule and names its source; nothing about this species is written for its page by a person or by AI, apart from the marked, credited quotations. How →
Where this page came from built 2026-10-22
gbif.species answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.synonyms answeredasked 2026-10-22gbif.vernacular answeredasked 2026-10-22names fetched 2026-10-22wcvp.distribution answeredas of 2026-06-04Kew's entry lists no native region, only 18 where it is introducedgbif.occurrences answeredas of 2026-10-21GBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hbdw64, of 2026-10-21; 18 records within 1 km of a botanic garden, herbarium or zoo left out (13 at a botanic garden or arboretum, 5 at a zoo; Wikidata's list)climate nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22native range not verified: no WCVP distribution with native status for this name, so records cannot be told from cultivation and no habitat climate is derivedwikidata answeredasked 2026-10-22found by its label; its IPNI identifier 778883-1 is IPNI's record of Salix speciosa Host, the same namewikipedia nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22inat.photos.wild nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22from iNaturalist's open data of 2026-09-27: research-grade observations with an open-licence photograph, the 24 whose photographs iNaturalist received last (the open data holds no votes); filled 2026-10-22inat.photos.cultivated not askedgbif.media nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22commons nothing to reportasked 2026-10-22openalex not askednot yet asked for this reference; a later fill takes the papers from OpenAlex's snapshotEvery source is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, refused, failed, not been asked, or answered twice where one answer is taken (“not taken: two items answered”), and, for a source asked when this page was built, when: the figures are as the source held them that day; a source read from a file (Kew's World Checklist, a GBIF download) says "as of" the file's day instead; a row carried from an earlier build of the page names that build instead. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 36 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.